Microsoft Graph
Graph access depends on API availability, tenant configuration, delegated or application permissions, consent, and security requirements.
SPFx
Microsoft Graph
Microsoft 365
SharePoint Framework engineering
Build, modernize, integrate, and support SharePoint Online solutions using SharePoint Framework, React, TypeScript, Microsoft Graph, PnPjs, and modern Microsoft 365 development practices.
USER
SharePoint / Microsoft Teams
SPFx
Microsoft Graph / SharePoint REST / PnPjs / APIs
Microsoft 365 & Business Systems
SPFx is strongest when SharePoint needs production-grade custom UI, supported extensions, Microsoft 365 integrations, or reusable components. Not every business application should be implemented in SPFx.
Custom web part development
Custom web parts should be configurable, responsive, accessible, performant, and maintainable after launch.
SharePoint Page
SPFx Web Part
Business Logic
SharePoint / Graph / API
Business Data
Extensions can support targeted SharePoint customization such as page-level experiences, commands, and contextual actions. They should be used for appropriate scenarios, not as a universal customization mechanism.
Graph access depends on API availability, tenant configuration, delegated or application permissions, consent, and security requirements.
SPFx
Microsoft Graph
Microsoft 365
Implementation choice depends on API requirements, authorization, maintainability, and the shape of SharePoint data.
SPFx
PnPjs / SharePoint REST
SharePoint Data
Secrets, API keys, and credentials should not be exposed in browser-side SPFx code. Use a secure API layer when the architecture requires it.
SharePoint
SPFx
Secure API Layer
Business System
Legacy JavaScript modernization
Script Editor, Content Editor, jQuery, and hard-coded custom scripts should be assessed before rebuilding. Some functionality may now exist natively in SharePoint or Microsoft 365.
Related service: SharePoint Modernization Services.
LEGACY
ASSESS
DECIDE: Retain / Replace / Modernize / Rebuild / Retire
MODERN
Customizations should be assessed separately from content migration. Script dependencies, old REST patterns, tenant-specific values, branding, navigation, integrations, and authentication changes can affect the target design.
Legacy SharePoint
Migration Assessment
Customization Inventory
SPFx Modernization
SharePoint Online
USER
SHAREPOINT ONLINE / TEAMS
SPFx Presentation Layer: React / Fluent UI / TypeScript
Service Layer: PnPjs / SharePoint REST / Microsoft Graph / Custom APIs
DATA & SERVICES: SharePoint / Microsoft 365 / Azure / Business Systems
Production SPFx work includes more than UI. Authentication, configuration, reliability, accessibility, and release management need to be designed explicitly.
SPFx executes in the user’s browser context, so security boundaries and API authorization must be designed explicitly. Do not place secrets in client-side code.
Performance depends on SPFx code and downstream services. Keep bundles lean, calls efficient, rendering controlled, and throttling in mind.
Accessible SPFx development uses semantic HTML, keyboard support, labels, focus management, contrast, and responsive behavior. Compliance certification requires a dedicated audit.
Existing SPFx solutions may need dependency, build-tool, React, Fluent UI, Graph, PnPjs, Node.js, or security remediation. Not every old solution can be upgraded without code changes.
Existing SPFx Solution
Technical Assessment
Dependency Review
Upgrade Plan
Code Remediation
Testing
Deployment
Troubleshooting focuses on reproducing the issue, isolating the failure, fixing the root cause, and validating in the target environment.
Issue
Reproduce
Diagnose
Fix
Test
Deploy
Validate
SPFx technical assessment
Assessment output focuses on findings, risks, recommended changes, and a practical modernization roadmap.
Findings
Risks
Recommended Changes
Modernization Roadmap
Use SPFx when it is the right architecture, not simply because custom code is possible. Native SharePoint, Power Apps, Power Automate, Microsoft Teams, Azure, or a custom application may be a better fit depending on the requirement.
01
Clarify business goals, users, current constraints, and support expectations.
02
Translate requirements into a practical scope, acceptance criteria, and dependencies.
03
Choose SPFx, Graph, REST, PnPjs, APIs, Power Platform, or native SharePoint where they fit.
04
Validate key UX, data, permission, and integration assumptions early.
05
Build with React, TypeScript, Fluent UI, maintainable components, and clear configuration.
06
Check behavior, permissions, browsers, responsiveness, accessibility, and API failure paths.
07
Review permissions, inputs, outputs, dependencies, and API authorization boundaries.
08
Package, version, release, and document the solution using the appropriate app catalog model.
09
Confirm the deployed solution works for business users in the target environment.
10
Plan maintenance, upgrades, fixes, documentation, and knowledge transfer.
SPFx project enquiry
Share the requirement, current environment, project stage, timeline, and context. Do not submit passwords, credentials, API keys, tenant secrets, or confidential source code through this form.
SPFx is the SharePoint Framework, Microsoft’s supported model for building custom SharePoint web parts and extensions that can integrate with SharePoint, Microsoft Graph, Microsoft Teams, and approved APIs.
Use SPFx when the requirement needs deep SharePoint UI integration, reusable web parts, extensions, custom page experiences, or Microsoft 365 API integration that native SharePoint or Power Platform cannot satisfy cleanly.
Often, but not always. Script Editor solutions should be assessed first because some functionality can now be handled by native SharePoint or retired.
Yes, where the business value still exists and the code can be moved to a supported architecture with modern dependencies, permissions, configuration, and testing.
Yes, subject to API availability, tenant configuration, permissions, consent, and security requirements. Graph access is not unrestricted.
Yes, but secure architecture matters. Secrets and API keys should not be placed in browser-side SPFx code; a secure API layer is often needed.
Some SPFx solutions can be exposed in Teams where the scenario and packaging model support it. The right approach depends on the user experience and deployment requirements.
Many can be upgraded, but old packages, Node.js versions, React compatibility, PnPjs changes, and API changes may require code remediation.
SPFx solutions are packaged and deployed through an app catalog, with tenant or site collection app catalog choices depending on the governance and deployment model.
Graph and API permissions require explicit planning, approval, and tenant configuration. Permissions should follow least-privilege principles.
Yes, if the current user and APIs have the required authorization. Implementation may use PnPjs, SharePoint REST, Microsoft Graph, or another suitable API.
SPFx can be part of a secure architecture, but it runs in the user’s browser context. Security depends on permissions, API design, input handling, dependencies, and secret management.
SPFx fits deep SharePoint UI and pro-code component requirements. Power Apps may fit forms and business apps. The best choice depends on UX, data, licensing, governance, and maintainability.
Timeline depends on requirements, integrations, permissions, tenant readiness, UX complexity, testing, deployment model, and support needs.