Skip to content

Migration

ShareGate vs AvePoint

By Suresh Girinathuni

Quick Verdict

Shortlist ShareGate for practical SharePoint and Teams migration with approachable admin workflows. Shortlist AvePoint when the program also needs broader governance, backup, records, compliance, or enterprise data management capabilities.

At a Glance

ShareGate compared with AvePoint
CriteriaShareGateAvePoint
Primary lensMigration and management productivityGovernance, migration, backup, and data management portfolio
Typical buyerMicrosoft 365 admins and migration teamsEnterprise IT, governance, compliance, and platform teams
ScopeFocused Microsoft 365 migration/admin scenariosBroader Microsoft 365 operations portfolio
LicensingVendor licensing varies by product and scopeVendor licensing varies by product bundle and scope

Which Should You Choose?

Choose ShareGate when

  • - Administrator-led Microsoft 365 migrations
  • - SharePoint and Teams migration planning and execution
  • - Practical reports and cleanup workflows
  • - Teams wanting a focused migration experience

Choose AvePoint when

  • - Large Microsoft 365 governance programs
  • - Migration combined with backup, compliance, and lifecycle needs
  • - Enterprise procurement and platform consolidation
  • - Complex operational control across Microsoft 365 data

Detailed Comparison

Migration execution

ShareGate: Strong focus for SharePoint/Teams migration teams.

AvePoint: Strong but often part of a larger platform conversation.

Governance breadth

ShareGate: Useful management/reporting capabilities.

AvePoint: Broader governance and data management portfolio.

Operational simplicity

ShareGate: Often attractive for admin-led workstreams.

AvePoint: Often attractive for enterprise program standardization.

Procurement fit

ShareGate: Good when migration/admin tooling is the main need.

AvePoint: Good when multiple Microsoft 365 control needs are bundled.

Architecture Differences

Both tools sit outside Microsoft 365 as administrative and migration platforms that connect to tenant workloads through supported APIs and permissions.

The architecture choice depends less on a feature checklist and more on governance operating model, migration scale, and post-migration administration needs.

For broader design context, visit the Migration Hub.

Can They Be Used Together?

Yes, when ownership and boundaries are clear. The safest pattern is to decide which option owns the system of record, which option owns the user experience, and which integration path keeps data, permissions, and operations understandable.

Licensing Considerations

Both are third-party tools. Licensing should be validated directly with the vendor against tenant size, workloads, products, term, support level, and required modules.

Decision Matrix

Focused SharePoint migration projectShareGate
Migration plus backup/governance programAvePoint
Admin-friendly cleanup and reportingShareGate
Enterprise platform consolidationAvePoint
Final vendor selectionPilot both against your source data and governance requirements

Sources